MDA Translational Research Program
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BREAK-OUT GROUPS MD Clinical Research
Coalition Meeting
Tucson, AZ
June 11-12, 2004
I. NATURAL HISTORY/GENETICS
Final recommendations:
-
Support a meeting of the minds to form a clinical research “coalition”
-
Support infrastructure for natural history studies
-
Support genotyping on a national level
-
Support a database that includes curated [sic], de-identified clinical data
-
Establish/support a core group of clinical evaluators
II. MEDICAL MANAGEMENT
Final Recommendations:
-
Establish working groups to develop standards for a national caolition
-
Establish core facilities to screen testing methods and coordinate data
collection protocols for cardiac, pulmonary, orthopedic complications of DMD
including:
-
Standard equipment
-
Standard questionnaire
-
Standard parameters
-
Develop plans to accommodate technology changes over time
-
Develop a list of protocols centered around medical management that could
sustain a clinical trials group during the “lean” years. For example:
-
Cardiac---effects of afterload reduction and bilevel ventilation on cardiac and
pulmonary function
-
Orthopedic---management of osteoporosis
-
Pulmonary---Effect of bilevel ventilation on quality of life
III. THERAPEUTICS
Final recommendations:
-
Feed the therapeutic pipeline
-
Support academic and biopharmaceutical target screening
-
Continue support for translational efforts
-
Define patient populations in a centralized fashion in regard to the following
parameters:
-
Epidemiology (to focus indication and assess study accrual feasibility)
-
Natural history (to determine treatment effect sizes and new endpoints)
-
Burden of disease (to evaluate pharmacoeconomic potential of a new therapy)
-
Genotype (to correlate with all of the above and selection patients for
clinical trials)
-
Support infrastructure to standardize and centralize diagnostics and outcomes,
such as:
-
Full-length sequencing (to correlate genotype with therapeutic efficacy and
safety)
-
Additional diagnostic methods (muscle MRI, DEXA cardiac assessment, other
biomarkers)
-
Correlations between biomarkers and clinical benefit parameters
-
Clinical evaluation parameters (training & retraining)
-
Long-term (eg, 5-year) support for clinical evaluators and study coordinators
-
Expand communications. Develop relationships with
-
Government granting agencies (to provide funds)
-
FDA (to enhance understanding of benefit:risk in DMD)
-
Drug companies (to make marketed drugs available for testing in DMD)
-
Parents (to ensure accrual of patients to studies while managing expectations)
IV. ORGANIZATION
This group identified the need for a coalition of independent groups to pull
together existing resources as well as develop new means to foster further
clinical research in DMD, foster training of investigators and other staff, and
satisfy the needs of all stakeholders. To achieve these goals a milestone
driven plan was put forward.
Final Recommendations:
-
Define the stakeholders and establish a development team by July, 2004
-
Develop a draft mission, vision, goals, and organizational structure by
September 2004
-
Investigate funding sources starting now
-
Apply for funding of the next meeting (December 2004)
-
Inaugural meeting of the coalition to occur Spring or Summer of 2005.
*Note: A detailed publication on this meeting is planned.
|